US Social Media Content Moderation: Junk Anti-trust Suits, Focus on Data Diet

The recent attack on the United States Capitol and Donald Trump’s subsequent ban from several major social media platforms has brought social media content moderation, and the possibility of government regulation, back into the national spotlight. The events at the Capitol demonstrate the pressing need for change in how platforms moderate and curate content, but just how this should be done is not nearly as clear.  

Policymakers will have to chart a course through hazardous waters, avoiding the temptation to employ dated tools, trampling on individual freedoms, and damaging the global competitiveness of some of America’s most prestigious firms, all while correcting a fragmented and dangerous information environment. The focus should be on the unique capacities of platforms to curate information to their users through algorithms, rather than leaning on outdated policy tools designed for fundamentally different business practices.  

But with a bipartisan collection of state attorneys general and Congress members pushing anti-trust suits against Google and Facebook, policymakers have already been drawn towards tools that are likely ineffective for the task. There are reasons to believe that even if won, these suits will prove to be an ineffective instrument for improving the shape of social media content, other purposes set aside. Some contend that antitrust laws are an outdated tool that fails in the face of the rapid scalability of social media. One of the spawns of a broken-up platform could quickly rise again to market dominance.  Additionally, a more diverse array of platforms does not address the issue of widespread misinformation; more platforms may lead to further fragmentation and misinformation as users seek out platforms that curate content suited to their unique desires. 

Another approach is reforming Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996, which provides immunity from liability for content created by users. Holding platforms liable for the content posted by users could help incentivize the removal of illegal content, but it comes with some serious drawbacks, as demonstrated with Germany’s 2017 Network Enforcement Act. Human rights groups and critics argue the liability clause incentivizes platforms to remove more content than intended and damages free speech, though the empirical evidence here is mixed. A similar law passed in France was gutted by its Constitutional Council at least in part due to its impact on free speech. Based on the criticism this approach faced in Germany and France, there is good reason to believe such a policy would be overturned in the Supreme Court if it could muster the unlikely political support needed in the first place.  

A more forwardlooking suggestion has been the widespread adoption of middleware, or “software that rides on top of an existing platform and can modify the presentation of underlying data.”While middleware gets to the heart of the issue by augmenting the underlying algorithm, it fails to necessarily improve on it. There is little reason to assume users would choose middleware that factchecks over that which curates conspiracy theories. Rather than being the competitive solution its authors tout it as, middleware would likely be much of the same.  

None of these approaches adequately address the fundamental issue – platforms curate content that maximizes screen time, often promoting misinformation and hate. Policymakers must instead approach this new business model and technology with a new toolkit form-fitted for the job. An important step forward would be the passage of a national data privacy law, creating transparency in how data is used by platform’s algorithms and giving users better control over how their data is used, and subsequently the content that they see. There is mutual interest here between platforms and regulators. Platforms are eager to have a uniform privacy law that would replace the inefficiencies of complying with the piecemeal assortment of state laws that currently exist. While a privacy law will be low on the policy priority list, given the challenges posed by the pandemic, its achievement is closer than ever before and could happen in the next few years. 

* Francis Fukuyama, Barak Richman, Ashish Goel, Foreign Affairs, “How to Save Democracy from Technology: Ending Big Tech’s Information Monopoly” (Jan/Feb 2021), 106-110. 

Counterpoint research is a young and fast growing research firm covering analysis of the tech industry. Coverage areas are connected devices, digital consumer goods, software & applications and other adjacent topics. We provide syndicated research reports as well as tailored. Our seminars and workshops for companies and institutions are popular and available on demand. Consulting and customized work on the above topics is provided for high precision projects.

Term of Use and Privacy Policy

Counterpoint Technology Market Research Limited


In order to access Counterpoint Technology Market Research Limited (Company or We hereafter) Web sites, you may be asked to complete a registration form. You are required to provide contact information which is used to enhance the user experience and determine whether you are a paid subscriber or not.
Personal Information When you register on we ask you for personal information. We use this information to provide you with the best advice and highest-quality service as well as with offers that we think are relevant to you. We may also contact you regarding a Web site problem or other customer service-related issues. We do not sell, share or rent personal information about you collected on Company Web sites.

How to unsubscribe and Termination

You may request to terminate your account or unsubscribe to any email subscriptions or mailing lists at any time. In accessing and using this Website, User agrees to comply with all applicable laws and agrees not to take any action that would compromise the security or viability of this Website. The Company may terminate User’s access to this Website at any time for any reason. The terms hereunder regarding Accuracy of Information and Third Party Rights shall survive termination.

Website Content and Copyright

This Website is the property of Counterpoint and is protected by international copyright law and conventions. We grant users the right to access and use the Website, so long as such use is for internal information purposes, and User does not alter, copy, disseminate, redistribute or republish any content or feature of this Website. User acknowledges that access to and use of this Website is subject to these TERMS OF USE and any expanded access or use must be approved in writing by the Company.
– Passwords are for user’s individual use
– Passwords may not be shared with others
– Users may not store documents in shared folders.
– Users may not redistribute documents to non-users unless otherwise stated in their contract terms.

Changes or Updates to the Website

The Company reserves the right to change, update or discontinue any aspect of this Website at any time without notice. Your continued use of the Website after any such change constitutes your agreement to these TERMS OF USE, as modified.
Accuracy of Information: While the information contained on this Website has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, We disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. User assumes sole responsibility for the use it makes of this Website to achieve his/her intended results.

Third Party Links: This Website may contain links to other third party websites, which are provided as additional resources for the convenience of Users. We do not endorse, sponsor or accept any responsibility for these third party websites, User agrees to direct any concerns relating to these third party websites to the relevant website administrator.

Cookies and Tracking

We may monitor how you use our Web sites. It is used solely for purposes of enabling us to provide you with a personalized Web site experience.
This data may also be used in the aggregate, to identify appropriate product offerings and subscription plans.
Cookies may be set in order to identify you and determine your access privileges. Cookies are simply identifiers. You have the ability to delete cookie files from your hard disk drive.