The United States Innovation and Competition Act and the Return of US Industrial Policy

The US government just got one step closer to passing its largest piece of industrial policy since the Cold War. And like the industrial policies of the Cold War era, this piece of legislation was crafted with a major geopolitical competitor in mind.

On June 8, the US Senate overwhelmingly passed S.1260, or the United States Innovation and Competition Act of 2021, with a margin of 68-32. The Bill received significant bipartisan support, a rarity for large investment packages in contemporary US politics. As many as 19 Senate Republicans, including Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, joined Democrats in voting for the Bill. Democratic presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, an independent, notably voted against the Bill. This uncanny episode of bipartisanship speaks to the growing sense of threat stemming from China and the widening consensus that a robust and secure domestic technology industry is foundational to curbing that threat.

The Bill calls for significant investments in America’s technology industry, including $52 billion in subsidies for semiconductor manufacturers, to combat perceived threats from China and to secure the industry from future shortages and disruptions. The ongoing chip shortage, market dominance of chip manufacturers TSMC (Taiwan based) and Samsung (South Korea based) over cutting-edge processes, and massive Chinese investment in semiconductor technology to reach self-sufficiency, all contributed to a sense among legislators that the US government must boost America’s domestic production of semiconductors to avoid overreliance on a geographically consolidated supply chain. New foundries are already underway, with Intel investing $20 billion to construct two new units in Arizona and TSMC breaking ground in the same state for a $12-billion foundry, with more potentially on the way. Meanwhile, Samsung is reportedly considering construction of a $17-billion foundry in Texas. These developments are a good start, but the US will have to start issuing subsidies fast if it wants to attract more cutting-edge production facilities – the cost of production for TSMC in the US is reportedly two to three times more than in Taiwan.

However, the Bill still has some distance to cover before it becomes law, and chip manufacturers like TSMC may have to wait for subsidies in the meantime. The Bill must pass through the House of Representatives, where it is likely to face challenges over subsidies to big technology companies at a time when this industry is being heavily scrutinized by both Democrats and Republicans. Additionally, out of fear that sensitive information could end up in Chinese hands, House Republicans are likely to question whether foreign firms with connections to China should be eligible for subsidies (TSMC and Samsung both have production facilities in China). Throughout this process, the Bill is likely to pick up new amendments, just like it did in the Senate, which will then have to be agreed upon by both the Senate and House before reaching the President’s desk.

The subsidies provided in this Bill are a good idea – both the US and the global economy would benefit from having a more robust and geographically diversified supply of cutting-edge chips. The current supply chain is too consolidated and incidents in one locale have an outsized influence on the globe, demonstrated by the impact of the Texas snowstorm on production at a foundry, as well as fears that low water levels may impact production in Taiwan.

The political posturing, however, is risky. The possibility of China cornering the semiconductor industry is far from imminent – the country remains a major importer of chips, signaling that it will be quite some time until it is self-sufficient, especially on leading-edge chips. Instead, political theatrics threaten to escalate tensions between the world’s two largest economies and place significant pressure on trading partners to choose sides.

The post-war geopolitical order was built on the liberal idea that economically interdependent states are less likely to wage war on one another. If the United States and China are serious about avoiding confrontation in the future, they must ratchet down the rhetoric, work towards ironing out genuine grievances on issues such as theft of intellectual property, and avoid decoupling their economies, especially on strategically vital resources like semiconductors. Self-sufficiency for these resources does not guarantee security; rather, it makes the possibility of confrontation more feasible, as the costs of engagement are not as severe. The two countries should work towards creating a more resilient, interdependent and geographically diverse supply chain for semiconductors, which will mitigate risks the world over.

Counterpoint research is a young and fast growing research firm covering analysis of the tech industry. Coverage areas are connected devices, digital consumer goods, software & applications and other adjacent topics. We provide syndicated research reports as well as tailored. Our seminars and workshops for companies and institutions are popular and available on demand. Consulting and customized work on the above topics is provided for high precision projects.

Term of Use and Privacy Policy

Counterpoint Technology Market Research Limited


In order to access Counterpoint Technology Market Research Limited (Company or We hereafter) Web sites, you may be asked to complete a registration form. You are required to provide contact information which is used to enhance the user experience and determine whether you are a paid subscriber or not.
Personal Information When you register on we ask you for personal information. We use this information to provide you with the best advice and highest-quality service as well as with offers that we think are relevant to you. We may also contact you regarding a Web site problem or other customer service-related issues. We do not sell, share or rent personal information about you collected on Company Web sites.

How to unsubscribe and Termination

You may request to terminate your account or unsubscribe to any email subscriptions or mailing lists at any time. In accessing and using this Website, User agrees to comply with all applicable laws and agrees not to take any action that would compromise the security or viability of this Website. The Company may terminate User’s access to this Website at any time for any reason. The terms hereunder regarding Accuracy of Information and Third Party Rights shall survive termination.

Website Content and Copyright

This Website is the property of Counterpoint and is protected by international copyright law and conventions. We grant users the right to access and use the Website, so long as such use is for internal information purposes, and User does not alter, copy, disseminate, redistribute or republish any content or feature of this Website. User acknowledges that access to and use of this Website is subject to these TERMS OF USE and any expanded access or use must be approved in writing by the Company.
– Passwords are for user’s individual use
– Passwords may not be shared with others
– Users may not store documents in shared folders.
– Users may not redistribute documents to non-users unless otherwise stated in their contract terms.

Changes or Updates to the Website

The Company reserves the right to change, update or discontinue any aspect of this Website at any time without notice. Your continued use of the Website after any such change constitutes your agreement to these TERMS OF USE, as modified.
Accuracy of Information: While the information contained on this Website has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, We disclaims all warranties as to the accuracy, completeness or adequacy of such information. User assumes sole responsibility for the use it makes of this Website to achieve his/her intended results.

Third Party Links: This Website may contain links to other third party websites, which are provided as additional resources for the convenience of Users. We do not endorse, sponsor or accept any responsibility for these third party websites, User agrees to direct any concerns relating to these third party websites to the relevant website administrator.

Cookies and Tracking

We may monitor how you use our Web sites. It is used solely for purposes of enabling us to provide you with a personalized Web site experience.
This data may also be used in the aggregate, to identify appropriate product offerings and subscription plans.
Cookies may be set in order to identify you and determine your access privileges. Cookies are simply identifiers. You have the ability to delete cookie files from your hard disk drive.